Back to blog
Bar chart showing AI interviews lead to a 12% higher job offer rate compared to human interviews.

Do AI Interviews Actually Work? A Landmark Study Gives a Resounding "Yes."

A landmark study of 70,000 applicants proves AI interviews outperform human recruiters, significantly boosting job offers by 12 percent and increasing new hire retention by 17 percent.

A new landmark study of 70,000 applicants proves AI-led interviews outperform humans, boosting job offers by 12 percent and new hire retention by 17 percent. The research, published in Voice AI in Firms, provides the clearest evidence yet that AI is an essential tool for modern industrial recruiting.

The study's findings offer data-driven validation of what FactoryFix has built: AI recruiters deliver more qualified candidates and better hiring outcomes.

Key Takeaways from the Study

The Surprising Results: AI Boosts Offers and Retention

Professional recruiters surveyed for the study predicted AI would perform worse than them. The data proved them wrong.

AI-interviewed candidates were not only more likely to receive an offer, but they were also more likely to accept it, start the job, and stay in the role. This outcome suggests the quality of the employer-employee match improved significantly when an AI handled the initial screening.

Evidence from ~70k applicants: AI screens drive better outcomes and a fairer experience—without replacing human judgment. Source: Voice AI in Firms.

What Do Candidates Want? (Hint: The AI)

The study dismantles the myth that candidates are resistant to AI. Given a direct choice, the overwhelming majority opted for an AI interviewer, likely due to the convenience and speed of 24/7 availability.

While applicants rated AI interactions as slightly less "natural," their overall satisfaction was identical to human-led interviews. More importantly, AI screening created a fairer process, with candidates reporting significantly less gender-based discrimination.

Why Does AI Perform Better? It's All About the Data

AI wins on consistency and depth. The study's analysis of interview transcripts revealed that AI recruiters were more likely to conduct comprehensive interviews, covering 50 percent more key topics than their human counterparts.

This structured, data-first approach elicits more relevant information, giving human hiring managers a clearer, more objective picture of each candidate's qualifications. AI doesn't get tired, have bad days, or forget to ask critical questions—it executes the perfect screen, every time.

To see the full study, you can read Voice AI in Firms: A Natural Field Experiment on Automated Job Interviews.

From Proof to Practice: How This Validates FactoryFix

The research provides powerful, third-party validation for the AI-driven approach FactoryFix pioneered. While the study used voice AI, the core principles are identical to our text and SMS-based AI recruiters:

The conclusion is clear: companies that leverage AI in their hiring process will find more qualified candidates, hire them faster, and retain them longer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the AI make the final hiring decision in the study?

No. In all cases, a human recruiter reviewed the AI interview and made the final decision, proving the value of an AI-human partnership.

Does this mean human recruiters are obsolete?

Not at all. It means their role is evolving. By automating top-of-funnel screening, AI allows recruiters to focus on higher-value work like candidate engagement and strategic decision-making.

How does this apply to FactoryFix's text-based AI recruiters?

The core principles of consistency, data quality, and bias reduction are universal. Whether through voice or text, a well-designed AI provides a more structured and effective screening process, leading to better outcomes.